- #Raw image thumbnailer and viewer pro#
- #Raw image thumbnailer and viewer plus#
- #Raw image thumbnailer and viewer professional#
- #Raw image thumbnailer and viewer windows#
After you add the miemetypes and thumbnails are finally being generated, we still have the issue with thumbnail generation being way way too slow. User basically has to wait for thumbnails to appear, and wait a long time.ĭepending on how many raw files are you seing in Nautilus, the thumbnail generation can last for over 30min (for a few hundreds of raw images, which is not a lot) on a very high end machine.
You can basically stare at the screen and count the seconds between each thumbnail that can take from 2 up to 10 seconds per thumbnail. Microsoft will add support for the RAW digital photo format in Windows.On a low end machines it’s not even worth having the thumbnailer, the time it takes to generate thumbnails is too long to be of any real use.
#Raw image thumbnailer and viewer windows#
It will be provided as an add-on to Windows XP and natively in the Longhorn release of Windows. Microsoft says that it has been working with partners Adobe, Canon, Fujifilm and Nikon to provide RAW support.Ĭurrently, most consumers do not have a need to use RAW format files.
#Raw image thumbnailer and viewer professional#
Most professional and so-called “prosumer” digital cameras offer it as a basic file type that photographers can capture images in. While it preserves much more digital information than the ubiquitous JPEG format, the files are also much larger and harder to work with. For one thing, JPEG files are compressed while RAW files are not. Professionals and aspiring professionals like RAW, however, because it enables them to have much more control of modifications to the image after the fact, during post production or what photographers refer to as “workflow.” Additionally, as prices for digital cameras have followed the classic price descent typified by PCs, and more cameras become capable of saving files in RAW format (as memory prices continue to fall), some observers believe RAW will become popular among general consumers.
Today, popular professional tools like PhotoShop support RAW files. “Unlike a JPEG, which is processed in the camera, a RAW file is processed on a PC, where the exposure and color can be adjusted after the image has been captured,” Microsoft officials said in a statement. “However, each new camera model introduces changes to RAW image files this in turn requires that digital imaging applications must also be updated to support these changes.” That, in fact, raises a touchy issue for imaging professionals.
#Raw image thumbnailer and viewer plus#
It is merely a common name used for the actual (“raw”) data format that the camera creates – plus some metadata that includes the camera’s settings for that photo. All vendors’ RAW formats are different and proprietary, and some are also encrypted.
#Raw image thumbnailer and viewer pro#
The camera vendors have typically provided their own translators but many pro users are frustrated, complaining about intellectual property ownership as well as poor performance in the vendors’ utilities. There have also been cases where a vendor has dropped support for an older RAW format.
All of this jealous secrecy has also at times made it difficult for companies like Adobe to provide the capability to view and edit some vendors’ RAW files. Some users have even formed an ad hoc standards “body” named that is aimed at trying to force standardization on the industry from a grassroots standpoint. There has been little, if any, cooperation among the big industry players to date, however. Some observers view Microsoft’s participation as welcome, because the company, along with its partners in this initiative, may have enough clout to pull the big players into line. Microsoft says it is working closely with its partners to ensure that users will be able to have a consistent experience as RAW’s popularity grows. However, the list of Microsoft partners does not include all the major players in the camera business – Sony and Kodak are both notably absent, for instance. However, hundreds of millions of copies of Windows XP and Longhorn can be a large lever and financial motivator towards encouraging more openness among vendors.
0 kommentar(er)
